Right To Information Lawyer

RTI is a law that enables the public to seek information from the public bodies. It has been implemented in India since 2005 and it is considered as one of the most important laws in India. The RTI Act, 2005, was enacted by the Government of India to provide for transparency and accountability in governance and administration by ensuring access to information about government operations. The RTI Act provides a right of access to information under the following heads:

1. Right to know: Citizens have a right to know what their government or public body does or how it works.

2. Right against Unlawful Censorship: Citizens have an absolute right not be censored while accessing or obtaining information under this act.

3. Right against Frivolous Litigation: Citizens have an absolute right not be harassed while seeking or obtaining information under this act. .

4. Right against Evasion: Citizens have a right to obtain information from their government or public body even if it is not yet classified under this act. Citizens have a right to obtain information from their government or public body even if it is not yet classified under this act.

RTI is the acronym for Right to Information Act, which is a law that gives the citizens of India the right to information about how their government functions. The RTI procedure in India is fairly easy and straightforward.

1. The first step is to file an application with the local government office where you live or work. It should be filed in person so that you can get a copy of your application and any supporting documents you need. To file an RTI, there are no specific fees associated with it other than a nominal fee for photocopying and postage if you have any documents that need to be submitted with your request.

2. The RTI procedure in India varies from state to state. For example, in Maharashtra, the applicant needs to send his or her application to the State Information Commission for approval. Once the commission approves it, you will receive a certificate of approval that says your RTI is approved.

3. However, this is not necessary in other states like Haryana and Rajasthan where permission can be given by a local government office on its own. In some cases it also depends on how publically accessible your information is as well. The process can take anywhere between ten days to two months depending on what documents are being requested.

4. Individuals who want to reunite with their family face a more lengthy process. The process can take anywhere between ten days to two months depending on what documents are being requested. In order for a family member to be reunited, they must provide the following:- A DNA sample- Fingerprints (three sets)- Two government-issued IDs that include the child in question- Proof of address in their home country, if the child and parent are from different countries- A copy of a birth certificate for the child The rights of children with immigration status in Canada are protected by Section 7 of the Charter Act. This means that any child who is not a Canadian citizen has basic rights that must be met before they can be deported. The Charter Act also states that children must not be separated from family members. To enforce this, immigration officials will only separate families if there is a legitimate reason to do so (such as documented abuse).

1. RTI stands for Right to Information Act which is a law that empowers every Indian citizen with the right to information about any public body. The Act was passed by Parliament in 2005 and it came into effect on January 16, 2006.

2. The RTI Act gives every citizen of India the right to make a request for information from any public authority or body. This means that citizens have the right to know how their government is spending their tax money and what they are doing with it. The RTI Act also states that citizens should be given prompt responses and should be informed of any decision taken by an authority or body within 30 days of making a request for information under the RTI Act.

3. The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) is a law of India that seeks to provide for greater transparency in the decisions and actions of government authorities. The RTI Act created a framework for citizens to request information from public authorities, which must be provided within 30 days.

4. The Information Commission is the national authority that provides information to citizens and enforces compliance with the RTI Act. The IC is also authorised to give directions, as well as conduct investigations, recommend penalties for non-compliance and publicise its findings. The RTI Act has achieved significant success in improving transparency in India. In a survey conducted by Transparency International India in 2016, more than 80% of respondents said that they were satisfied with the effectiveness of this law.

There have been several notable cases related to Right to Information (RTI) laws that have been heard by the Supreme Court and various High Courts in India. Some of the popular cases related to RTI include:

1. Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) case: In 2011, the Supreme Court ruled that answer sheets of students who appeared for exams under the CBSE are covered under RTI laws, and can be accessed by applicants seeking the same.

2. Girish Ramchandra Deshpande case: In 2012, the Supreme Court clarified that an individual’s personal information that has no relationship to any public activity or interest cannot be disclosed under RTI. However, details like service records, performance evaluation reports of public servants, etc. are disclosable.

3. Namit Sharma case: In 2013, the Delhi High Court directed all public authorities to upload on their website RTI applications, responses, and appeals and to update the same on a regular basis.

4. Subhash Chandra Agrawal case: In 2013, the Supreme Court ordered the disclosure of the names of account holders who have stashed black money in foreign banks. This ruling helped in bringing transparency in financial dealings and unearthing black money.

5. RBI vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry case: In 2015, the Supreme Court ruled that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) cannot refuse to disclose information about banks under RTI, as this information is of public interest and affects the economy.